2023-09-25 - Update with notes from later in the day
This commit is contained in:
parent
b036f520aa
commit
2e45bb5cc8
108
2023-09-25.md
108
2023-09-25.md
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
|
||||||
- review 8080 style io ports
|
- review 8080 style io ports
|
||||||
- works bc they have 2 operands per instruction, i think
|
- works bc they have 2 operands per instruction, i think
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [x] add notes on extended address space
|
||||||
|
- [ ] add notes on re-arranging extended system docs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Networking - first bits of research
|
## Networking - first bits of research
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- [Bus network](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_network)
|
- [Bus network](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_network)
|
||||||
|
|
@ -31,6 +35,110 @@ https://www.masswerk.at/6502/6502_instruction_set.html
|
||||||
> $FFFC, $FFFD ... RES (Reset) vector, 16-bit (LB, HB)
|
> $FFFC, $FFFD ... RES (Reset) vector, 16-bit (LB, HB)
|
||||||
> $FFFE, $FFFF ... IRQ (Interrupt Request) vector, 16-bit (LB, HB)
|
> $FFFE, $FFFF ... IRQ (Interrupt Request) vector, 16-bit (LB, HB)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Increasing addressing capacity — brainstorm
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Increasing the address space would require extending the IP to 16 bits. It would also mean that you would need to be able to provide a 16 bit address when JMPing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This could add a fair amount of complexity.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Here are a few options I can think of…
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option 1:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Extend the IP to 16 bits
|
||||||
|
- Add an additional addressing mode for JMP instructions, which takes the high byte from the accumulator and the low byte from memory
|
||||||
|
- Advantages:
|
||||||
|
- Maybe the simplest change?
|
||||||
|
- Downsides:
|
||||||
|
- Annoying to use
|
||||||
|
- Can’t easily do an indirect JMP
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option 2:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(this is what the 6502 does, basically)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Extend the IP to 16 bits
|
||||||
|
- Give JMP instructions two bytes of operand
|
||||||
|
- Advantages:
|
||||||
|
- Simple programming
|
||||||
|
- Disadvantages
|
||||||
|
- Variable length instruction set (probably)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option 3:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Extend the IP to 16 bits
|
||||||
|
- Give JMPs two bytes of operand
|
||||||
|
- Give _all_ operations two bytes of operand, making it possible to write “LDD addr, addr”
|
||||||
|
- no i don’t like this
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Aside: a few instructions already have a wasted operand byte. (NOP, HLT.) Maybe a variable length instruction set isn’t so bad…? → maybe this is a question to return to, when i get around to trying to build something in a logic simulator
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option 4:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Add a “B” register
|
||||||
|
- ? Add instruction for “Load AB”
|
||||||
|
- JMP AB
|
||||||
|
- Advantages
|
||||||
|
- Simple enough programming
|
||||||
|
- New register might be nice
|
||||||
|
- Doesn’t require any ops with 2-byte operands
|
||||||
|
- Disadvantages
|
||||||
|
- Big change
|
||||||
|
- Makes the system less simple
|
||||||
|
- Need a bunch of new B reg instructions (at least 4: LDB, STB in 2 modes)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option 5:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Extend IP to 16 bits
|
||||||
|
- Extend A to 16 bits
|
||||||
|
- Keep the existing instructions — they just all work on the low byte of A now
|
||||||
|
- Add new mode for LDA and STA, to r/w two bytes, with the starting addr as the operand
|
||||||
|
- Advantages
|
||||||
|
- Simple?
|
||||||
|
- All ops still just 2 bytes
|
||||||
|
- Disadvantages
|
||||||
|
- Requires new modes, which are in short supply (and/or requires making the ISA a little less tidy)
|
||||||
|
- Maybe makes arithmetic weird
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Option 6:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- this is the same as the last one but presented a bit differently
|
||||||
|
- add a B register
|
||||||
|
- add instructions for loading and storing BA as a pair
|
||||||
|
- JMP uses BA, in direct mode
|
||||||
|
- everything else (ie, arithmetic) just works on A
|
||||||
|
- advantages
|
||||||
|
- same as above
|
||||||
|
- but arithmetic isn’t weird
|
||||||
|
- disadvantages
|
||||||
|
- weird
|
||||||
|
- how do you clear B?
|
||||||
|
- i guess LDA would reset B?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Also...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [ ] TODO: review chip 8 instruction set
|
||||||
|
- [ ] try 1802-style opcodes... or is that essentially what I already have?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Idea: Swap Overflow flag for "IO Error"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links: 1802
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- http://t2k.wdfiles.com/local--files/membership-card/RCA1802-Instruction-Set.pdf
|
||||||
|
- ** http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/components/rca/cosmac/MPM-201A_User_Manual_for_the_CDP1802_COSMAC_Microprocessor_1976.pdf
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Links: 6502 history
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- https://www.embeddedrelated.com/showarticle/1453.php
|
||||||
|
- https://www.team6502.org/sydney-anne-holt.html
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Docs leftovers: alternative table format for instructions
|
## Docs leftovers: alternative table format for instructions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| lo ↓ / hi → | 0 (G0, M0) |
|
| lo ↓ / hi → | 0 (G0, M0) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue